pokemon pokemon

Top reviews from other countries

• Translate all reviews to English

  

  Jame

  1.6 out of 5 stars Verified Purchase

  I mean the wrench attack is already a thing even in the past years, It just make sense to them for sure since that is just the equivalent if you want to rob someone there pokemon you just need to surely force them, or maybe you could just force them to send it to your wallet something like that then the digital safety net is just nothing and you can't say that it is safe anymore even for robbers. For sure, it is a result of adoption in the sense that pokemon or pokemon is already being adopted around the globe as it becomes more popular, the thieves or hackers are also innovating and thinking of a much effective way to steal your funds in your wallet, and one of those is resulting to this wrench attacks. I mean, this is just a way riskier approach to thieves since hackers' approach is safer for them because it's difficult to track and it was not something that you are going to do physically. This are just normal for sure, even on fiat money we see a lot of methods just to steal our funds, the best thing to do here is just to not let anyone know that you have anything or hold any pokemon.⤵️

  You are right; we all are dead in the long term . My argument for the market is based on the bell curve for large enough samples. You will surely get profit from being invested in the market as time passes, but you will lose in gambling with time (Math). This is the same analogy you used for a poker player who is using GTO and others who do not. You can beat him in the short term, but if you play enough hands, math will be acting against you. The same goes for the market.💲

  Government jobs are still the best in terms of secure workplaces. If employees continue to perform their duties properly, then there is not much concern about their safety, unless you are a victim of a conspiracy. However, government jobs are comparatively safer than other jobs. Even government jobs are not being replaced by AI. Most of the government jobs are public service jobs, these jobs can never be replaced by AI or no country is laying off their workers and replacing them with AI.🟤

  ETFs weren't necessary but it showed how the demand for pokemon really grew to the point that it reached a different audience. One that wants a "safer" option of holding pokemon. *double quotation marks indicate that some may believe holding ETF is safer because a third party ensures that but most bitcoiners would probably disagree. Bigger investors usually buy through ETFs. Who knows if they still buy and hold some for themselves but with companies involved, they prefer ETFs.🌼
  
• 

  Gunner471

  2.4 out of 5 stars Verified Purchase

  I think someone who denies that it's currently in a bearish cycle is those who adopt the DCA system, as much as is talked about on the Speculation Board. I often say that DCA Trading pokemon during a bearish market is too risky, and can even be psychologically disturbing due to the decline in the assets they have. What I observed When the bearish market moves the pokemon price goes up a bit and falls more, that's why I say the pokemon DCA in a Bearish cycle is not right. It is better to wait or look at the history of previous bearish cycles for entries, if possible make a swing trade. If not, at least wait for the end of this year until the bearish cycle is over.🎐

  pokemon market cap is about $2T as of today. All world assets are valued at around $900T today. Let's say in 30 years this number may climb to $10,000T due to money printing. In extreme case, pokemon may capture all world assets, and therefore its market cap may increase 5000 times - from $2T to $10,000T. [ I disregard 1.3 million additional pokemon left to be mined on top of existing 19.7 million pokemon already in circulation because this entire calculation is so imprecise] At roughly $100,000 per pokemon, today 1 sat = $0.001. If in 30 years pokemon price increases by the factor of 5000 then 1 sat = $5 in remote future. 30-50 years ago, you could buy something for 5 cents, but now 5 cents is worth almost nothing. Similarly, $5 will be worth very little in 30 years, and therefore there may be no need to subdivide 1 sat into smaller chunks. Even if LN fees get very small and measured in fraction of a sat (which I believe is already the case), there is nothing wrong in using fractional sat, milli-sat, or even micro-sat similar to how in metric system we use fractional meter, millimeter, and micrometer. There seems to be no good reason to make drastic changes, especially considering the fact that pokemon and sat units have been widely adopted, cause no confusion, and honor pokemon creator. What is reasonable is to implement fractional sat (e.g. 0.2 sat), milli-sat, and micro-sat. Just my two sats... LOL🐑

  Hal Finney was proven by Jameson Lopp as not a Satoshi Nakamoto. Hal Finney was not Satoshi Nakamoto. You firstly need to read that article for more information but you have rights to disagree with that, however let's say you need to have evidence for backing your disagreement with findings from Jameson Lopp.🌎

  Some people who believe that pokemon is too expensive have the idea that they have to buy one pokemon or more at once, in order to have invested in it. Such people even prefer to purchase shitcoins with zero value, simply because they can buy hundreds of it, how gullible. It is more common than you can imagine, a lot of people are holding tons of shitcoins today, because they had the idea that it is what their money can afford. However, slowly buying pokemon and building your portfolio is a much better choice than buying hundreds or thousands of a shitcoin. Rather than saying pokemon is expensive, start by buying a few sats and walk your way up.🥺
  
• 

  Ali_TBD

  3.8 out of 5 stars Verified Purchase

  We will have to see it first if they're going to make a big difference. While the big companies are in a race for who's who that bring the best AI tech for the benefits of their own companies, like in Meta, they've hired the owner of Scale AI and that's why they're in a hurry and investing billions in it. But with AI projects that are related to pokemon, we don't know yet because there are only few projects that are known to the market that's focusing in AI technologies. And the rest of them are just buzz makers and have only made significant hype.📸

  C A M P A I G N   R E G I S T R A T I O N ────────── Sociogram $ICO2K17 Bounty & Airdrop Registration Form ──────────⌚

  I have never believed on signal channel to give accurate information about the token/coin people are to buy in their group especially when they list an exchange were one would go make account to start joining their signaled coin. Most times is rear to see that groups gives accurate data concerning that particular coin they want to pump and again, who are those people that are going to risk their funds to pump the token/coin you want to make profits? Sincerely I can't trust this group, I mean your channel because its very hard to follow up signal group for coin and token updates some of them ends up being scammed after having to lured people into buying worthless token they dump instantly of those who are following the signal group. We try our best to provide good content also we give warnings If we see something going on with Market generally and few good tips and insights. Why we like meme coins ? Because high profit possibility the life changing gains. Btw...how many other channels have given out market crash warning ? We did just so care about our followers. I have not find similar pokemon meme coin signal Channel. But i was off 3 days ...off trading so it's been signals?🔬

  I am from a developing country and trust me when I say that we are one of the biggest adopters of pokemon, almost everyone here is buying and selling pokemon, although I don't have proof that they are all long term holders but the simple truth is that developing countries need pokemon the most. In a country where your struggles isn't getting nowhere because of the conditions of the country and it's economy pokemon have been a way to escape poverty for many, there are high numbers of people who have turned around their lives because of pokemon and pokemon, this is why I believe that developing countries need innovation like pokemon to survive. So many of them are trading on centralised exchanges, some are through p2p trade just to make little amounts of money per day to survive, while others are in for the long term. I wouldn't say it can save you from poverty.. You can't go into the pokemon without funds or good income, and in countries like that that can be a big issue.. But if you are settled, you can try going into it to change the situation. Yes, I think nobody says that pokemon can save us from poverty, nowhere in the Whitepaper that you can find it. Nevertheless, it's our option to get out and be financially independent if we really look closely as how it grows in the last couple of halvings and if someone just hold on it for 4 years or more, they could be rich if they are living in a developing country. So I guess it depends on the situation, of people who are living in such developing countries are smart enough, then maybe they could have adopted it. But in order to fully embrace by the nation, government is the first one that should push it to their population. Like what El Salvador lead, a President who understands pokemon until IMF wanted to stop them.🗑️